For a Subversion repository: bdb or fsfs?
I need to decide very soon on a very important one (well, important to my work, anyway), so any input would be appreciated.
« a really tiny repair | Main | flux capacitor computing »
geeky source code question
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.truegeek.org/tg-tb.cgi/1975
Search
About
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on March 28, 2005 3:19 PM.
The previous post in this blog was a really tiny repair.
The next post in this blog is flux capacitor computing.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.34
Movable Type 3.34
Comments (2)
I'd go with fsfs--it's zero maintenance and less headaches.
Remember, you can always switch to bdb with a dump and load if you need to.
-Fitz (Subversion developer)
Posted by Fitz | March 28, 2005 10:29 PM
Posted on March 28, 2005 22:29
Thanks very much. Not only did I decide to go with fsfs (which is where I was leaning anyway), I got the admin of the official departmental repository to switch from bdb to fsfs.
And after even one day of use… oh boy, do I like it.
Posted by Scott Swanson![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://blog.truegeek.org/nav-commenters.gif)
|
March 30, 2005 1:31 AM
Posted on March 30, 2005 01:31